NCT is encouraging and supporting this campaign - we have supported
change in this practice now for more than a decade and have been
encouraging researchers to carry out research in the area so the
evidence to force a change in practice is there ... it's getting there
slowly - we need a big push by everyone to get it to happen. Belinda Phipps
I am a practicing Midwife with 24 years experience. Seven years ago, I
truly reflected on my practice with regards to the third stage of labour
and the wide spread practice of Immediate Cord Clamping after teachers
voiced their concern at the increasing numbers of children with medical
or learning problems. I also observed the same in friends and family
children.
After extensive searching and confirmation of very worrying
statistics, I had an epiphany and realised that this common practice
implemented 40-50 years ago was an interruption of a fundamental birth
process, which deprived the baby of up to 40% of its intended blood
volume, with unknown results and for the most part absolutely
unnecessary.
On approaching managers and doctors, I was told I had an interesting
scientific theory which was not evidence based. I pointed out at that
time that Immediate Cord Clamping was not evidence based. I was informed
that to change practice I would have to produce evidence.
I wrote to
the RCM and asked for immediate national clarification on timing of
clamping the umbilical cord. At the time there was little evidence but
George Morley from the US was convinced that Immediate Cord Clamping was
the cause of irreversible brain damage leading to Autistic Spectrum
Disorders. From that time, I immediately started offering all my women
informed choice with regards to delaying the clamping and cutting of
their babies cord. Over the years I have received a good deal of
antipathy.
Over the past 7 years, there has been a growing body of evidence to
support the delay in clamping and cutting of the umbilical cord. The
World Health Organisation, Unicef, ILCOR, International Confederation of
Midwives, FIGO and more recently the Royal College of Midwives have all
recommended Delay in Cord Clamping as best practice. Timings vary from 1
to 5 minutes.
NICE are intending to review and publish new guidelines but not until
November 2014 and there is no guarantee that they will include Delaying
Cord Clamping in the new guidelines.
Many hospital doctors are reluctant to change their guidelines until
NICE give the go ahead, whereas other hospitals i.e. Darlington,
Liverpool and Worcester have taken the lead and changed their guidelines
despite NICE recommendations.
Two years is too long to wait when there is ample evidence to indicate
that Immediate Cord Clamping is detrimental to babies. I am part of a national team which includes Consultant Paediatricians, Obstetricians
and Neonatologists. Together we developed the basics trolley, a small
resuscitaire which enables the umbilical cord to remain intact whilst
resuscitation occurs. Much of the evidence shows that compromised and
premature babies benefit from delayed cord clamping.
As part of a growing global network, I was delighted to be approached by
the NCT and I would like to invite you all to join the campaign to
lobby the National Institute of Clinical Excellence to change the
Current Guidelines which recommend Immediate Cord Clamping (NON evidence
based practice, proven to be detrimental to babies and normally
performed before baby has breathed) to recommend Delayed Cord Clamping
for at least 3-5 minutes, but ideally until the cord stops pulsating.
http://www.change.org/petitions/nice-implement-delayed-cord-clamping-immediately?share_id=QmzivsMSYS&utm_campaign=petition_created_email&utm_medium=email&utm_source=guides
Amanda Burleigh RGN RM
No comments:
Post a Comment